Construction Crew Putting Up Framing of New Home

Wall panels create opportunity for 30% fewer framing days, 20% less waste

US housing remains underbuilt by ~7mm units, while affordability is as challenged as the mid-1980s when mortgage rates were >10%. Residential construction also faces a labor shortage of 200k-400k workers and is at risk of further pressure from US immigration policy. As such, we believe offsite construction is primed for meaningful share gains, with potential profound implications across the US housing industry. This study focuses on wall panel conversion, which arguably represents the next logical opportunity following roof trusses, but is still merely an incremental piece of the puzzle. Notwithstanding, we estimate wall panels alone generate up to a 30% reduction in framing days with 20% less waste. We collaborated with 5 production builders, multiple offsite experts and 10 global ۶Ƶ analysts to conduct an extensive assessment of the economics of converting stick-built walls to open wall panels.

Penetration could >2x w/in 15 years; opp. for +USD 6,175 incremental profit/house

Wall panels represent just one step in the evolution towards full offsite construction, but we believe this study highlights the opportunities/challenges of a conversion. In our view, prior third-party studies may have overlooked important considerations including fewer job-site trips, fewer failed inspections and less job-site waste. We estimate that conversion from traditional stick-built walls to open wall panels produces roughly +USD 6,175 in total incremental operating profit/house (Figure 5) and we expect industry penetration to more than double to ~40% over the next 15 years.

What are the cost savings opportunities across the housing value chain?

US offsite construction penetration has significantly lagged many global markets for a myriad of reasons including consumer preference, companies' reluctance to change and availability of labor and material supply. For wall panels specifically, these constraints have led to the vast majority (~80%) of savings accruing to the trades and suppliers, despite the homebuilder being the ultimate decision maker.

  • Estimated total net profit opportunity: +USD 6,175/unit across the value chain.
  • Net impact is disproportionately spread across: trades = 64% (+USD 3,932), builder = 20% (+USD 1,241), suppliers = 16% (+USD 1,002) 
  • Key Drivers: Base Labor (+USD 4,921/unit), Base Material (-USD 3,166/unit), Variance (+USD 1,906/unit), Cycle Time (+USD 2,024/unit), Equipment (-USD 1,400/unit).

A total cost approach is necessary to fully harness the potential

Homebuilders have resisted converting to wall panels because in isolation, cost increases USD 783/unit. However, the true opportunity is incremental production capacity from improved cycle times (USD 2,024/unit). Builders will need to work closely with trade partners and all parties must embrace a total cost approach to realize the full potential.

Authorised clients of ۶Ƶ Investment Bank can log in to ۶Ƶ Neo for the full access.