
Executive summary
Market and hedge fund update in a nutshell
Risk assets were broadly mixed in April as the month featured elevated volatility driven by uncertain tariff policies from the US administration. Although US policy regarding tariffs remained fluid, the pause in implementation announced post “Liberation Day†and solid corporate earnings helped stabilize markets after a sharp corrective tone at the beginning of the month. Concerns about recession were tempered by supportive macroeconomic data, despite concerns about inflation and higher unemployment. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P500 and NASDAQ indices produced mixed performance in April. In Equity / Hedged, US Equity Hedged strategies saw gains in April, led by technology stocks and momentum factors, while energy stocks and value factors lagged. Long positions in AI stocks were favorable. European Equity Hedged strategies benefited from utilities, German stocks, and idiosyncratic factors, with European-focused managers outperforming. Leverage was reduced due to tariff uncertainties. Asian Equity Hedged strategies faced losses, impacted by Chinese market exposure and de-listing fears, despite a late rebound in Japanese themes and easing trade tensions. In Relative / Value Fixed income relative value strategies generated negative performance due to risk-off moves, interest rate volatility, and capital flight from US bonds. Capital structure and volatility arbitrage strategies saw mixed outcomes. Merger arbitrage and eventdriven strategies were mostly positive, with tighter merger spreads despite intra-month volatility. Agency MBS and Quantitative equity strategies had mixed performance. In Credit / Income, corporate credit strategies had mixed performance in April, with corporate long/short strategies benefiting from short positions and outperforming in the US and Europe, while corporate long-biased strategies incurred losses from widening credit spreads, particularly in high yield bonds and leveraged loans. Asset-backed strategies (ABS) as well as Reinsurance/ILS strategies were mostly positive. In Trading, Discretionary trading strategies were mostly positive in April, with gains driven by interest rate receivers, curve steepeners, and short USD positions, while Japan payers and curve flatteners faced challenges. Systematic trading strategies generally underperformed, with trend-following and FX themes experiencing losses due to sharp equity market reversals and USD movements, although some gains were made in interest rate trading and diversified alpha models faced difficulties.
Index | Index | Apr-25 | Apr-25 | Mar.25 | Mar.25 | Feb-25 | Feb-25 | QTD | QTD | YTD | YTD | 1Y Annualized Return | 1Y Annualized Return | 3Y Annualized Return | 3Y Annualized Return | 5Y Annualized Return | 5Y Annualized Return | 10Y Annualized Return | 10Y Annualized Return | Volatility (10Y) | Volatility (10Y) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | MSCI World Total Return - Net USDÂ | Apr-25 | 0.89 | Mar.25 | -4.45 | Feb-25 | -0.72 | QTD | 0.89 | YTD | -0.92 | 1Y Annualized Return | 12.16 | 3Y Annualized Return | 11.06 | 5Y Annualized Return | 13.95 | 10Y Annualized Return | 9.34 | Volatility (10Y) | 15.05 |
Index | FTSE US Broad Investment-Grade Bond Index | Apr-25 | 0.39 | Mar.25 | 0.02 | Feb-25 | 2.23 | QTD | 0.39 | YTD | 3.18 | 1Y Annualized Return | 8.05 | 3Y Annualized Return | 1.92 | 5Y Annualized Return | -0.68 | 10Y Annualized Return | 1.55 | Volatility (10Y) | 5.05 |
Index | Barclays Global High Yield Index | Apr-25 | 0.85 | Mar.25 | -0.32 | Feb-25 | 0.79 | QTD | 0.85 | YTD | 2.72 | 1Y Annualized Return | 10.75 | 3Y Annualized Return | 7.46 | 5Y Annualized Return | 6.35 | 10Y Annualized Return | 4.49 | Volatility (10Y) | 8.49 |
Index | Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return | Apr-25 | -4.81 | Mar.25 | 3.93 | Feb-25 | 0.78 | QTD | -4.81 | YTD | 3.64 | 1Y Annualized Return | 4.08 | 3Y Annualized Return | -3.70 | 5Y Annualized Return | 13.74 | 10Y Annualized Return | 1.70 | Volatility (10Y) | 13.73 |
Index | ICE BofA Merrill Lynch 3-month T-Bill Total Return | Apr-25 | 0.34 | Mar.25 | 0.33 | Feb-25 | 0.32 | QTD | 0.34 | YTD | 1.37 | 1Y Annualized Return | 4.88 | 3Y Annualized Return | 4.35 | 5Y Annualized Return | 2.62 | 10Y Annualized Return | 1.90 | Volatility (10Y) | 0.55 |
Index | HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index | Apr-25 | 0.56 | Mar.25 | -1.12 | Feb-25 | -0.82 | QTD | 0.56 | YTD | -0.06 | 1Y Annualized Return | 5.16 | 3Y Annualized Return | 4.47 | 5Y Annualized Return | 6.44 | 10Y Annualized Return | 3.49 | Volatility (10Y) | 5.01 |
Index | HFRI Equity Hedge (Total) Index | Apr-25 | 0.66 | Mar.25 | -2.22 | Feb-25 | -0.95 | QTD | 0.66 | YTD | -0.88 | 1Y Annualized Return | 7.13 | 3Y Annualized Return | 6.29 | 5Y Annualized Return | 9.84 | 10Y Annualized Return | 5.81 | Volatility (10Y) | 8.76 |
Index | HFRI Event-Driven (Total) Index | Apr-25 | -0.38 | Mar.25 | -1.47 | Feb-25 | -0.07 | QTD | -0.38 | YTD | -1.06 | 1Y Annualized Return | 7.33 | 3Y Annualized Return | 5.65 | 5Y Annualized Return | 9.60 | 10Y Annualized Return | 5.08 | Volatility (10Y) | 7.14 |
Index | HFRI ED: Credit Arbitrage Index | Apr-25 | -0.15 | Mar.25 | -0.68 | Feb-25 | 1.10 | QTD | -0.15 | YTD | 1.44 | 1Y Annualized Return | 6.74 | 3Y Annualized Return | 6.90 | 5Y Annualized Return | 9.57 | 10Y Annualized Return | 5.48 | Volatility (10Y) | 6.86 |
Index | HFRI Macro (Total) Index | Apr-25 | -2.69 | Mar.25 | 0.23 | Feb-25 | -1.17 | QTD | -2.69 | YTD | -2.61 | 1Y Annualized Return | -4.22 | 3Y Annualized Return | 0.57 | 5Y Annualized Return | 4.97 | 10Y Annualized Return | 2.60 | Volatility (10Y) | 4.86 |
Index | HFRI Macro: Systematic Diversified Index | Apr-25 | -3.98 | Mar.25 | -0.83 | Feb-25 | -2.52 | QTD | -3.98 | YTD | -6.89 | 1Y Annualized Return | -12.50 | 3Y Annualized Return | -3.21 | 5Y Annualized Return | 2.82 | 10Y Annualized Return | 0.92 | Volatility (10Y) | 7.73 |
Index | HFRI Relative Value (Total) Index | Apr-25 | -0.92 | Mar.25 | -0.03 | Feb-25 | 0.72 | QTD | -0.92 | YTD | 0.81 | 1Y Annualized Return | 6.69 | 3Y Annualized Return | 5.04 | 5Y Annualized Return | 7.14 | 10Y Annualized Return | 4.26 | Volatility (10Y) | 4.39 |
Strategy performance
March 2025 | March 2025 | Month-to-date | Month-to-date | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2025 | MSCI World Total Return - Net USD | Month-to-date | 0.9 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 0.9 |
March 2025 | FTSE US Broad Investment-Grade Bond Index | Month-to-date | 0.4 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 3.2 |
March 2025 | Barclays Global High Yield Index | Month-to-date | 0.9 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 2.7 |
March 2025 | Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return | Month-to-date | -4.8 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 3.6 |
March 2025 | BofA ML T-Bills (3M) | Month-to-date | 0.3 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 1.4 |
March 2025 | HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index | Month-to-date | 0.6 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | -0.1 |
March 2025 | HFRI Equity Hedge Total Index | Month-to-date | 0.7 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | -0.9 |
March 2025 | HFRI Event Driven Total Index | Month-to-date | -0.4 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | -1.1 |
March 2025 | HFRI ED: Credit Arbitrage Index | Month-to-date | -0.2 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 1.4 |
March 2025 | HFRI Macro Total Index | Month-to-date | -2.7 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | -2.6 |
March 2025 | HFRI Macro: Systematic Diversified Index | Month-to-date | -4.0 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | -6.9 |
March 2025 | HFRI Relative Value Total Index | Month-to-date | -0.9 | ³Û±ð²¹°ù-³Ù´Ç-»å²¹³Ù±ðÌý | 0.8 |
Monthly hedge fund review
Overall market commentary
Risk assets were broadly mixed in April as the month featured elevated volatility driven by uncertain tariff policies from the US administration. Although US policy regarding tariffs remained fluid, the pause in implementation announced post “Liberation Day†and solid corporate earnings helped stabilize markets after a sharp corrective tone at the beginning of the month. Concerns about recession were tempered by supportive macroeconomic data, despite concerns about inflation and higher unemployment. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P500 and NASDAQ indices produced mixed performance in April. The Dow Jones Industrials and S&P500 posted negative performance of -3.17% and -0.76%, respectively. Conversely, the NASDAQ posted a gain of +0.85% last month. Across Europe, equity markets were also mixed as investors contemplated changes to asset allocation in line with the volatile geopolitical climate. The MSCI Europe and FTSE generated negative performance in April of -1.56% and -0.64%, respectively, while the DAX posted positive performance of +1.50%. Asian developed markets produced positive results with the Nikkei 225 generating a gain of 1.20% despite a stronger Japanese Yen and tariff headwinds. Emerging market indices also produced mixed performance. Chinese markets declined -1.70% in line with the prolonged trade tension with the US. On the other hand, Brazil and India demonstrated resilience, rallying by +3.69% and +3.65%, respectively. US interest rate markets rallied modestly in April as the probability for recession seemed to increase. The two-year US Treasury yield fell to 3.61% from 3.89%, while the ten-year US Treasury yield eased to 4.16% from 4.21%. The Barclays US Corporate Investment Grade Index was little changed at -0.03%, while the Barclays US Corporate High Yield Index fell -0.02%. Commodity prices were mixed with gains from precious metals as a function of safe haven status amid US dollar weakness. Conversely, energy price declines were related to increased OPEC production despite softening global demand. During April, gold rose +5.4%, while crude oil fell -18%. In currency markets, the Euro rallied 4.70% from 1.0819 to 1.1327, while the US dollar declined -4.6% against the Japanese Yen from 149.51 to 142.63.
Equity Hedged
US Equity Hedged strategies generally produced positive performance in April. Although most managers reported gains for the month, there was a wide degree of dispersion within the various cohorts due to specific stock selection and timing of any exposure adjustments made throughout the month. Results varied across sectors, as technology stocks were modestly positive during the month, driven by continued strength in earnings and positive guidance on capital expenditure. Conversely, energy stocks experienced sharp declines due to concerns over slowing growth tied to tariffs and fears of increased production from OPEC. The strength in technology and some late month re-grossing provided an uplift to the momentum and growth factors, while value and quality factors lagged. Industry alpha was generally positive, driven by long positions in AI-related stocks, especially within power names, which outperformed.
European Equity Hedged strategies generally produced positive performance in April. Alpha gains were driven by size, momentum, utilities, Germany and idiosyncratic factors. European-focused managers outperformed other regional counterparts as USfocused managers were typically positive, while Asia-focused managers were mostly negative. Managers generally reduced both their gross and net leverage in April amidst tariff turmoil.
Asian Equity Hedged strategies generally produced negative performance in April. While exposure to Japanese themes was generally positive, the bulk of the losses came from exposure to China. The Japanese market remained volatile, initially selling off following Liberation Day tariff announcements but rebounding later in the period. Market themes were supported by expectations of US / Japan trade talk and the easing of JPY appreciation. In China, it was also a volatile month, although markets started to stabilize in the second half of the month as trade tensions softened with some expectation of renewed negotiations. Consequently, market indices closed lower but well off their lows. ADRs tended to lag on the back of de-listing fears. Also, the domestic market generally outperformed the offshore markettariffs.
HFRI Equity Hedge Total Index
MTD 0.66%
QTD 0.66%
YTD -0.88%
Relative Value
Fixed income relative value strategies generated negative performance in April. The weakness was a function of the risk-off moves, which led to spikes in interest rate volatility, capital flight from US bonds and associated selling pressure in more crowded levered positions, such as long US swap spreads. The main detractors from performance were US swap spread trading, followed by US cash / futures basis and bond RV strategies. European swap spread short positions also incurred losses due to the capital rotation from US Treasuries into Bunds. Japanese directional short positions exacerbated relative value losses for some managers. Those who outperformed generally avoided the swap spread moves and/or had larger tail hedge exposures, such as front-end tenor basis wideners, equity / credit put options, or received front-end rates.
Capital structure / volatility arbitrage strategies generated mixed performance in April. Convertible arbitrage managers with shorter duration and more gamma sensitive risk profiles tended to outperform those with longer duration and more credit sensitive risk profiles. Volatility trading accounted for the bulk of gains, while credit exposure detracted modestly. Option hedges were challenged last month, while credit hedges were slightly positive. Approximately USD 2bn of global convertible issues came to market, with about 65% coming from the US, approximately 20% from Europe, and the remainder from Asia. Utility convertible arbitrage trades performed well due to investor interest in those risk profiles, while de-listing risk led to declines in US listed China ADRs. There was a limited number of corporate actions during the month. Cross-asset correlations were extremely volatile, particularly with US Treasuries, due to intra-month volatility prompting ‘flight to quality’ trades. Credit arbitrage relative value strategies were challenged as basis packages widened, liquid credit short positions generally outperformed their related equity long positions, and stressed/distressed credit long positions generally underperformed their equity hedges. Non-investment grade convertible bond spreads widened to 429bps last month, while the Bloomberg US HY ‘B’ Index spread increased to 383bps. The spread between non-investment grade convertible bonds and the Bloomberg HY ‘B’ Index increased to +46bps from +27bps.
Merger arbitrage strategies and event-driven strategies generated mostly positive performance in April. merger spreads were 1% tighter on average for the full month, after having widened by as much as 2.5% intra-month. The most notably tighter spread was US Steel/Nippon Steel, which tightened significantly following the announcement of a new CFIUS review, followed by Discovery/Capital One, which tightened following approval from the OCC and the Federal Reserve. Mr. Cooper widened following difficulties on Rocket borrow. Through the end of April, YTD M&A volumes tracked down ~50% YoY. April was the slowest month for public company M&A in the last 5 years. The total arbitrage opportunity set opportunity declined by nearly 20%, with the closing of 8 transactions constituting nearly USD 50bn in aggregate transaction value, as well as deal progress in Discover / Capital One. April performance for equity capital markets strategies was modestly positive amidst an understandably quiet month for deal activity given all the volatility around Liberation Day. Investors who were able to maintain their exposure to the late March Coreweave IPO were ultimately rewarded.
Agency MBS strategies generated mixed performance in April. The month featured a fair degree of dispersion in managers. In terms of positive contributors, managers benefited from positive carry and mortgage basis short positions. However, OAS on mortgage derivatives widened during the month and this was the main source of losses across the sub-strategy.
Quantitative equity strategies generated mixed performance in April. Given the market dynamics, volatility factor was a driver of results during the period. Momentum and reversal type factors were also additive in April.
Conversely, macro sensitivity factors were challenged in April with AI exposure the only contributor in the group.
Sensitivity to oil prices led to losses as crude oil prices continued their decline.
Retail exposure was also challenged given the depth of uncertainty surrounding tariffs. While normally a defensive staple, quality type factors faced difficulties. Value factors as a group performed poorly in April as many of the high book-value companies which make up the long-leg of most Value type factors were those most impacted by tariff announcements. While growth type factors performed better than value, results were still mixed as continued policy uncertainty counterbalanced falling inflation and interest rate cut expectations.
HFRI Relative Value Total Index
MTD -0.92%
QTD -0.92%
YTD 0.81%
Credit / Income
Corporate credit strategies generated overall mixed performance in April. The corporate long / short sub-strategy produced a positive return as gains were driven by short positions as managers with low net exposures outperformed relative to funds who were positioned in a net long. In addition, the US and European funds outperformed relative to Asian funds. The corporate long-biased sub-strategy generated a loss as managers were negatively impacted by the widening in corporate credit spreads. Losses were generally attributable to investments in high yield bonds and leveraged loans. Given the long-biased nature of the sub-strategy, performance was in line with expectations.
Asset backed strategies (ABS) generally produced positive performance in April. Most funds finished the monthly flat to marginally positive, although funds with exposure to the higher beta segments of structured credit underperformed. At the portfolio level, gains from interest income were largely offset by mark-to-market losses that occurred as a result of spread widening. Gains were largely attributable to SRT (significant risk transfer) transactions, short duration private credit, and non-agency RMBS. Conversely, CLO equity investments underperformed and generated losses.
Reinsurance / ILS strategies generally produced positive performance in April. Results were again primarily a function of carry / accrued coupon income for the catastrophe bond manager and premium accrual for the collateralized reinsurance manager. However, there was a slight negative offset from spread widening for the catastrophe bond manager and a small incremental gain for the collateralized reinsurance manager as a result of a positive revision to the reserves taken for the California wildfires. The spread widening witnessed for the catastrophe bond manager was due to typical seasonality heading towards the hurricane season as well as the expectation for a near-term increase in supply.
HFRI ED: Credit Arbitrage Index
MTD -0.15%
QTD -0.15%
YTD 1.44%
Trading
Discretionary trading strategies generally produced positive performance in April. Most managers produced gains, except for those with exposure to relative value themes, such as swap spreads, as well as a more paid bias in EUR rates. Gains were largely driven by interest rates receivers, curve steepeners in G3 as well as short USD bias, especially against the Euro and JPY. In contrast, Japan payers and curve flatteners faced headwinds last month. Long positions in volatility also provided gains. Some managers generated gains from tactical equity trading in some of the core themes, such as technology, defense and financials. There was also some positive performance from index shorts earlier in the month. Emerging market (EM) managers were mostly positive in April, with the majority of the gains coming from receivers in rates across EM. In some cases, there was also some participation in developed markets (DM) trades in rates, such as curve steepeners and receivers in European markets. Short exposure to the USD was also additive, including in the more popular DM pairs. Some managers added to results from tactical trading around the frontier space and benefitting from short positons in places like Nigeria. Additionally, a long volatility bias was generally additive.
Systematic trading strategies generally produced negative performance in April.
Trend following strategies were challenged by the sharp reversals in equity markets. FX themes were also weak, as the USD moved lower following the US tariff announcements. Commodity trading was mixed, as some managers were challenged from long exposure in energy, such as oil and gas. Alternative commodity markets generally detracted from performance. Interest rate trading was flat to positive as receiver and steepening positions added to results. Systematic managers with more diversified alpha models were also challenged during the month as FX, equity and energy detracted.
HFRI Macro Total Index
MTD -2.69%
QTD -2.69%
YTD -2.61%
Endnotes
Archive
HFS Bulletin
- Monthly hedge fund update – March 2025
- Monthly hedge fund update – February 2025
- Monthly hedge fund update – January 2025
- Monthly hedge fund update – December 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – November 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – September 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – August 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – July 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – June 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – May 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – April 2024
- Monthly hedge fund update – March 2024
Latest insights
Contact us
Make an inquiry
Fill in an inquiry form and leave your details – we’ll be back in touch.
Introducing our leadership team
Meet the members of the team responsible for ÃÛ¶¹ÊÓÆµ Asset Management’s strategic direction.