
Building resilience through diversified alternatives
Building resilience through diversified alternatives
For decades, the 60:40 portfolio – 60% equities and 40% bonds – was the cornerstone of most investors. Yet, the traditional model is facing significant headwinds. Changing macroeconomic conditions, inflation uncertainty, and shifting equity-bond correlations have all questioned the reliability of this approach. In this context, alternative investments are gaining attention as an appealing complement to traditional strategies.
Private equity, private credit, real assets, and hedge funds are no longer viewed solely as niche allocations. Instead, they are increasingly considered components of a broader, more resilient portfolio framework. Among these, hedge funds may deserve renewed consideration – not only for their diversification characteristics but also for their potential to navigate complex market conditions with greater flexibility.
Rethinking diversification: the rise of alternatives
Rethinking diversification: the rise of alternatives
Alternatives are not a monolith – they include a diverse spectrum of investment types that may behave differently from traditional asset classes. Each type can serve a distinct role:
- Private equity targets high-growth companies, often inaccessible through public markets.
- Private credit may offer stable income through direct lending and bespoke financing.
- Real assets like infrastructure and real estate, can act as a hedge against inflation and contribute to portfolio diversification.
- Hedge funds, long overlooked by private investors, might offer both diversification and liquid flexibility – particularly in volatile or uncertain markets.
While private equity and credit typically require long-term capital commitments, hedge funds can offer more liquid exposure and may respond more dynamically to changing market environments. A carefully constructed allocation across these segments could support improved portfolio resilience over time.
Building an alternative allocation: a three-part framework
Building an alternative allocation: a three-part framework
1. Define your strategy
Constructing an alternatives portfolio begins with clear intent:
- Return focus: Seeking growth, income, or absolute returns?
- Risk appetite: How much volatility and drawdown can you withstand?
- Liquidity profile: Are you prepared for illiquid investments – or do you need tactical flexibility?
- Time horizon: Are you thinking in decades or in business cycles?
Allocations vary from investor to investor, and highly depend on personal objectives, appetite for risk and tolerance for illiquidity. As a general rule, holding up to 20% of a liquid portfolio in alternative should enable investors to avoid running short of cash, including in periods of market stress. This allocation may rise up to 40% if an investor have modest cash flow needs from their portfolio and can draw on liquidity from another source.
2. Combine illiquid and liquid alternatives thoughtfully
A diversified portfolio may benefit from a blend of long-term strategies and shorter-term flexibility:
Segment | Segment | Role | Role | Liquidity | Liquidity | Return profile | Return profile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Segment | Private equity | Role | Long-term growth | Liquidity | Low | Return profile | Higher volatility |
Segment | Private credit | Role | Income generation | Liquidity | Low | Return profile | Moderate risk-return |
Segment | Real assets | Role | Inflation sensitivity and income | Liquidity | Low | Return profile | Cyclical exposure |
Segment | Hedge funds | Role | Tactical flexibility and stability | Liquidity | Medium | Return profile | Strategy-dependent |
Some investors may choose to implement this through a core-satellite structure, combining broadly diversified strategies with select, higher-conviction opportunities.
Use a core-satellite structure:
- Core: Multi-manager platforms or diversified funds of funds for stability.
- Satellite: High-conviction single-strategy funds for opportunistic exposure.
3. Stay committed for the long term
Private markets require careful pacing. Capital is often deployed gradually, and distributions may occur years later. Without continued reinvestment, exposure can decline. A long-term capital plan may help mitigate vintage concentration and maintain consistent exposure.
Hedge fund allocations, in contrast, may offer more liquidity and flexibility. Some investors adjust allocations tactically – scaling exposures to directional or diversifying strategies based on changing macro conditions.
For private markets, commitment pacing is crucial:
- Capital is deployed gradually (over 3-5 years).
- Distributions return capital later – so without reinvestment, exposure declines.
- A programmatic commitment cycle ensures compounding and mitigates vintage risk.
In contrast, hedge funds can play a more dynamic role:
- Tactically increase allocations during volatility.
- Rebalance into or out of directional strategies depending on macro trends.
- Maintain consistent exposure to diversifiers for structural portfolio support.
Why hedge funds now?
Why hedge funds now?
In today’s market environment – characterized by shifting macro regimes and stretched valuations – hedge funds may offer several potential benefits to an alternatives portfolio:
1. Diversification with downside protection
Certain hedge fund strategies are designed to perform independently of market direction. Strategies such as equity market neutral, multi-strategy, and macro trading have demonstrated the ability to reduce portfolio drawdowns during market sell-offs. Historical analysis shows that incorporating hedge funds into a traditional portfolio not only smooths performance but accelerates recovery from drawdowns.
Example: In one illustrative scenario, a 20% hedge fund allocation in a 60:40 portfolio, sourced equally from equities and bonds, historically reduced volatility from 9.2% to 8.5%, and improved annualized returns from 5.7% to 5.9% (ÃÛ¶¹ÊÓÆµ, HFRI, 1997-2024).
2. Flexible exposure in shifting markets
Hedge funds are unconstrained vehicles with access to tools beyond the reach of most long-only managers. This includes short positions, derivatives, and structured instruments. That flexibility enables them to capture opportunities and mitigate risk across asset classes, regardless of market direction.
Styles like:
- relative value (exploiting pricing inefficiencies);
- macro (positioning across global themes);
- event-driven (capitalizing on corporate actions);
- equity hedge (long/short equity strategies).
3. Substitute or complement? Both.
Depending on the strategy, hedge funds may act as a complement to or a substitute for traditional assets.
- Diversifiers (e.g. systematic CTAs, macro multi-strategy) act as low-correlation stabilizers – ideal bond or equity complements.
- Substitutes (e.g. equity hedge, convertible arbitrage) offer targeted exposure with better risk-return dynamics than traditional asset classes.
Hedge funds have historically shown upside participation during up markets, while helping to protect capital in drawdowns – a combination that may support more stable long-term return compounding.
How endowments have led the way
How endowments have led the way
Large endowments and institutions have played a pioneering role in allocating to alternatives. Yale and Harvard paved the path decades ago:
- holding 30-50% of assets in alternatives;
- diversifying across vintages, managers, and geographies;
- using hedge funds not just to generate alpha – but to reduce portfolio fragility. While private investors may not fully replicate this model, the core principles – diversification, discipline, and manager selection – are broadly applicable. They adopt similar principles using structured programs, evergreen funds, and guided solutions, depending on their individual circumstances.
Risks and considerations
Risks and considerations
Alternative investments offer attractive long-term benefits – but they also come with distinct risks:
- Illiquidity: Many alternative strategies, particularly private equity and credit, require long lock-up periods.
- Leverage: Some hedge fund and credit strategies use borrowing to enhance returns, which increases downside risk.
- Transparency: Information on fund holdings and strategy shifts may be limited.
- Operational complexity: Manager selection, risk oversight, and governance structures vary widely.
- Performance dispersion: Within each style, outcomes can differ significantly by manager. Indices are not directly investable and may not reflect actual portfolio performance.
The future of portfolio construction
The future of portfolio construction
The traditional 60:40 model may no longer provide the same level of diversification or downside mitigation as it once did. For investors looking to navigate today’s more complex market environment, a broader approach – including private equity, private credit, real assets, and hedge funds – may offer added resilience and potential long-term benefits.
While alternative investments are not suitable for all investors, those who can accommodate the unique risks and characteristics may find value in constructing a thoughtfully diversified alternatives portfolio.

The Red Thread – Private Markets
Our semi-annual insights into private markets
Our semi-annual insights into private markets
Related insights
- Building the future of innovation
- Real Estate: The Red Thread – Private Markets
- US Real Estate Outlook – Edition May 2025
- Asia Pacific Real Estate Outlook – Edition May 2025
- Switzerland Real Estate Outlook – Edition May 2025
- Global Real Estate Outlook – Edition May 2025
- Europe Real Estate Outlook – Edition May 2025
- Green footprints?
- TRTPM monthly blog – Edition April 2025
- TRTPM monthly blog – Edition March 2025
Contact us
Make an inquiry
Fill in an inquiry form and leave your details – we’ll be back in touch.
Introducing our leadership team
Meet the members of the team responsible for ÃÛ¶¹ÊÓÆµ Asset Management’s strategic direction.